Open Access

Selecting interventions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption: from policy to action, a planning framework case study in Western Australia

  • Christina M Pollard1Email author,
  • Janette M Lewis2 and
  • Colin W Binns1
Australia and New Zealand Health Policy20085:27

DOI: 10.1186/1743-8462-5-27

Received: 04 September 2008

Accepted: 24 December 2008

Published: 24 December 2008

Abstract

Background

The Department of Health in Western Australia identified access to, and daily consumption of recommended amounts of fruit and vegetables, as priority health determinants. The numerous factors that influence supply and consumption of fruit and vegetables indicated that a comprehensive approach would be required.

A government and non-government sector steering group was set up to select priority interventions using the National Public Health Partnership's Framework for Implementing Public Health Strategies. This structured framework was used for developing strategies to improve fruit and vegetable consumption and supply, and to identify implementation priorities.

After one year a desktop audit of progress on framework interventions was undertaken.

Results

The structured framework led to a plan for defined actions, partners, costs, and performance indicators for strategies to improve fruit and vegetable consumption and supply. Lead agency custodians for management of the selected interventions were identified.

After one year there was significant progress in the implementation of a number of the high-ranking interventions. The exception was interventions that provide the infrastructure support such as research and development capacity, information systems.

Conclusion

A structured framework and stakeholder participation assisted in developing a fruit and vegetable implementation strategy. Engagement and commitment of influential and diverse stakeholders is needed, not just for program support, but particularly in the areas of food and nutrition policy development and providing the infrastructure support required. Further work is required to develop performance outcomes and cost effectiveness measures for many of the strategies that have been proposed to address portfolio objectives.

Background

The impact of government policies in relation to the provision of a healthy diet available to all (nutritional quality), needs to be assessed in relation to overweight and obesity [1]. The highest rates of obesity occur in the populations with the lowest socioeconomic status [2]. Poverty, deprivation and limited access to healthy foods explains some of the differential. Calories provided by whole grains, fresh produce and lean meats have been found to be more expensive than those from refined grains added sugars and added fats [3]. Although fruit and vegetables are an expensive source of dietary energy, they provide key nutrients at reasonable costs [4]. In contrast, although refined grain foods, added sugar and hardened fats are usually affordable, enjoyable and readily accessible, they contain the least nutrients per unit cost [4].

Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption as an obesity prevention strategy

Emerging evidence suggests that increasing fruit and vegetables may assist dietary weight management strategies to prevent obesity [5, 6]. Energy density is reduced by higher intake of fruit and vegetables [7]. Eating larger amounts of fruits and vegetables increases the feeling of satiety and results in the displacement of more energy dense foods [6]. People tend to eat a consistent daily volume of food, regardless of the energy content of the food, therefore, the energy density of food has an impact on the daily energy intake [3]. Incorporating more fruit and vegetables can reduce the overall energy density of the diet, promote satiety and decrease the total energy intake and increase diet quality [3, 8, 9].

Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption has been identified as a global public health nutrition priority [10, 11] and has been the focus of population health in Australia [1117]. Epidemiological studies estimate that substantial reductions in diet-related disease and health care costs would be achieved if fruit and vegetable consumption were raised to recommended levels [5, 18].

Addressing the influences on consumption of fruit and vegetables

Numerous factors that influence consumption of fruit and vegetables indicate that a comprehensive approach is required [19]. Consumption is influenced by structural factors impacting on supply [20]. Cost components of accessibility occur throughout the value chain: cost of production, processing, transport, wholesale and retail marketing practices [21]. Changes in any of these cost components can have an impact on either final price or cost effectiveness of selling in some locations, particularly rural and remote areas [22]. Alongside these supply factors lie individual eating behaviours [23, 24].

Interventions need to address sociocultural, economic, educational and technical challenges to expand and address the fruit and vegetable supply chain. Strategies required include increasing:

• consumer awareness of benefits of healthy eating, motivation, and skills to increase consumption

• fruit and vegetable production and availability

• understanding of the components of consumer food choice attributes (taste, texture, form, price, convenience, quality and safety)

• innovation and the development of fruit and vegetable based food products

• opportunities for consumption in various settings, for example worksites

• implementation and evaluation of educational campaigns integrated with efforts to increase availability of and access to fruit and vegetables [25].

Government policy [14] and dietary guidelines [2628] form the basis for most nutrition interventions in Australia. A planning process is required to select effective interventions and actions to bring about the desired changes. A planning framework was developed for the National Public Health Partnership to assist Australian government health departments with their planning, management, quality assurance and provision of public health interventions [29]. Barraclough & Gardner assert that, in Australia, if policy goals are shared between the Federal, State and Territory levels, the implication is that they will be pursued more vigorously [30]. Commencing in 2001, a systematic approach to planning the provision of public health interventions was used by the Department of Health Western Australia (DHWA) to prepare the "Eat Well WA-Fruit and Vegetable Strategy".

The Western Australian (WA) government had sponsored a social marketing campaign approach to increase fruit and vegetable consumption for over a decade, partnering with government and non-government sectors [31]. The success of partnerships between health and industry sectors working on the government's campaign depended on the right mix of organisational commitment, leadership, relationships, opportunities and capacity to achieve [32].

Although WA had the highest daily intake of fruit in 1995, and the second highest of vegetables of any other state or territory in Australia, levels are still lower than recommended for optimal health [33]. Consumer research identified the following barriers to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in Western Australia:

• personal and family eating habits that are difficult to change

• false impression of already eating enough

• perceived high cost, particularly of fruit

• inconsistencies in price of fruit and vegetables

• lack of skills in preparation of tasty and convenient fruit and vegetable dishes

• perception that vegetables are time consuming to prepare

• concerns about pesticide residues and genetically modified foods

• lack of, or limited supply, poor quality and high cost (in isolated areas) [32, 34].

Method

The Department of Health in WA led the development of the "Eat Well WA-Fruit and Vegetable Strategy" (EWWAFV) to advise on and coordinate activities to improve access and increase consumption of fruit and vegetables. A framework with a systematic approach to planning the provision of public health interventions was used [29]. The approach ensured that a comprehensive range of intervention types were considered and the capacity to carry out the interventions. The following steps were used:

1. Identify the determinants of health

2. Assess the risks and benefits posed by each determinant to identify what should be addressed

3. Identify intervention options and appraise them

4. Decide on the portfolio of interventions

5. Implement the portfolio

6. Evaluate the portfolio [29].

Literature and program reviews identified health determinants and their risk/benefits. Based on these, two health determinants were chosen:

• access to fruit and vegetables

• consumption of at least 300 g (2 servings) fruit and 375 g vegetable (5 servings) daily [35].

A comprehensive approach to intervention planning covers policy, program interventions, and the infrastructure required to support them. The full range of intervention types were considered to decide appropriate actions. Types included public policy development, legislation and regulation, resource allocation, engineering and technical interventions, incentives (financial and other), service development and delivery, education (including skills development), communication (including social marketing), collaboration/partnership building (community and intersectoral), community and organisational development (including organisational policy) [29]. The Department of Health outlined the types of interventions that could be considered using available evidence and the intervention recommendations from a national case study [16, 17]. Next, stakeholders were consulted to capture other possible interventions. Involvement of both the government and non-government sector would be crucial for effective action in implementing strategies [36].

Two distinct management portfolios were defined, which related to access and consumption of fruit and vegetables. These recognised that better access to fruit and vegetables is likely to assist in increasing consumption, while increasing consumption has implications for improving access. Portfolio one addressed the access to fruit and vegetables health determinant with the management objective "to increase and sustain access to high quality, safe, affordable vegetables and fruit". Portfolio two addressed the health determinant relating to consumption with the objective "to increase consumption of fruit and vegetables by people in WA to meet or exceed recommendations".

A steering group with representatives from relevant sectors was formed to lead the development of the strategy and select priorities for action. Members represented the retail, hospitality, catering, education, horticulture, agricultural and transport sectors, environmental health, regional health, produce retailers, fruit growers, vegetable industry, non-government health organisations, and consumers. Members were asked to weight the relative importance of interventions using the available evidence and their knowledge and professional judgement. The group assigned a score out of 10 to each intervention for its expected performance against specific criteria including: effectiveness, equity, feasibility, acceptability, timing and sustainability.

Lead agency custodians for management of the selected interventions were identified. Custodians were expected to be responsible for the overall management and communication between partnering organisations to implement the particular intervention. Partners required to support the implementation were enlisted. In addition specific actions, costs, and performance indicators or measures were identified and confirmed by the steering group. Key stakeholders from government departments, non-government organisations and the fruit and vegetable industry were invited to form a Steering Committee and an EWWAFV strategy workshop was held to initiate the process. Participants from relevant sectors were invited – government (health, agriculture, education, industry, training and transport), non-government health agencies, the fruit industry (from gate to plate), Foodbank WA, hospitality, and training, and horticulture industries. Attendees were asked to nominate to be part of a committee to oversee the development of a ten-year strategy and implementation plan. The committee reviewed interventions in the two management portfolios, their suggestions were added and priorities for action determined.

Results

The strategy development process took over a year with meetings every four to six weeks. The stakeholders engaged extensively in the strategy development and intervention assessment process. Most of the group attended meetings and were active throughout the process. Tables 1 and 2 show the 33 high-ranking interventions in both portfolios in 2002. A mass media campaign to promote fruit and vegetables was identified as a priority activity with the Department of Health as the lead agency due to their experience in and commitment to social marketing campaigns. Research and development were priority activities for identified industry groups. The hospitality industry (including hospitality training organisations), the Departments of Agriculture, Transport, and Environmental Health were custodians for the management of a number of fruit and vegetable supply strategies. Individual industry grower groups were identified to promote specific fruit and vegetables as a priority activity.
Table 1

High-ranking interventions in Portfolio 1 Goal: Health Determinant: access to fruit and vegetables (f&v), assessment of actions at one year ( = not started, = some progress, = significant progress). Management objective: to increase and sustain access to high quality, safe affordable fruit and vegetables

Policy interventions

Public Policy development

1. Develop and support f&v consumption guidelines and position statements-

2. Develop and support nutrition policies promoting f&v in schools-

Legislation and regulation

3. Advocate for legislation for restriction of food advertising directed at children-

Community & organisational development (including organisational policy)

4. Support local initiatives and organisations to develop and implement food and nutrition policies and improve access to f&v-

5. Encourage the development of retailer training policies for handling f&v e.g. 'Retailer of the year' award-

Program interventions

Incentives (financial and non-financial)

6. Support award schemes that increase access to f&v for consumers:-

- Worksite

- Childcare & Schools (e.g. STARCAP1 and Start Right-Eat Right2)

- Hospitality (e.g. Gold Plate Award3)

- Supplier/retailer and transport operator accreditation/incentive schemes

- Product awards (e.g. WA Nutrition Awards4)

Service Development and delivery

7. Support the promotion of f&v in hospitality and catering training-

8. Support ongoing systems and food safety training e.g. HACCP5, SQF6 and approved supply programs-

Communication (including social marketing)

9. Support dissemination of FSANZ policies and promotional materials relating to f&v-

10. Provide consumers with promotional materials on best conditions for storing fresh foods through retail outlets-

Collaboration/partnerships(community and intersectoral

11. Support welfare agencies in the provision of f&v (e.g. FoodBank3)-

Infrastructure support

Identification and surveillance of determinants

12. Collect and analyse information to assess f&v supply, cost, quality, access, sales/marketing (e.g. Market basket survey)-

Information systems

13. Develop systems to improve communication of f&v marketing & information through the supply chain eg price, quality, volume statistics-

Research and development capacity

14. Identify f&v supply issues in rural and regional development plans and make recommendations for action-

15. Identify and test assumptions about critical factors impacting on price, quality and access to f&v – remote, rural and urban-

Plant and equipment

16. Advocate for appropriate f&v storage facilities in remote community stores-

Leadership

17. Establishment of a Western Australian Taskforce on Equity in Food Access-

1 Star Canteen Accreditation Program http://www.waschoolcanteens.org.au/pages/starcap/01-starcap.htm, 2 [45], 3 Foodbank Western Australia http://www.foodbankwa.org.au, 4 WA Nutrition Awards http://www.population.health.wa.gov.au/Promotion/wa_nutrition.cfm, 5 HACCP Based Food Safety Programmes and Endorsements http://www.haccp.com.au/, 6 Safe Quality Food Institute http://www.sqfi.com/

Table 2

High-ranking interventions in Portfolio 2 Goal: Health Determinant: consumption of 375 g vegetables (5 servings) and 300 g (2 servings) fruit daily (f&v), assessment of actions at one year ( = not started, = some progress, = significant progress). Management objective: to increase consumption of fruit and vegetables by people in Western Australia to meet or exceed recommendations

Policy interventions

Public Policy development

18. Encourage whole of government organisations' policies to support f&v consumption-

Resources allocation

19. Support DOH resources allocated to support f&v mass media campaign: TV, radio, press, publications, point of sale, school activities, sponsorships, retailer and food service promotions-

Community & organisational development (including organisational policy)

Encourage the development of school/childcare food and nutrition policies and canteen foodservice guidelines e.g. STARCAP1, Start right – Eat Right2-

Program interventions

20. Increase the emphasis on the nutrition component in teacher training-

21. Address barriers to conducting school visits to f&v production sites and markets-

Communication (including social marketing)

22. Support statewide f&v campaigns consistent with Australian dietary guidelines recommendations e.g. retailer point-of-sale promotions, co-promotions/branding (e.g. Go for 2&5®4) –

23. Increase public awareness of individual's health and economic benefits of eating more f&v (e.g. FOODcents5)-

Collaboration/partnership building (community and intersectoral)

Promote f&v tastings and demonstrations-

Infrastructure support

Identification and surveillance of determinants

24. Collect and analyse information to assess consumption and consumer attitudes to f&v-

Information systems

25. Disseminate research (e.g. publish food consumption and trends)-

Research and development capacity

26. Research best practice programs to increase f&v consumption-

27. Release f&v guidelines-

1 Star Canteen Accreditation Program http://www.waschoolcanteens.org.au/pages/starcap/01-starcap.htm, 2 [45]3 [46]4[34]5[47]

A desktop audit of progress on framework interventions one year after the portfolios were developed revealed significant progress in the implementation of a number of the high-ranking interventions, see indicators of progress of actions on Tables 1 and 2. None of the infrastructure support interventions for Portfolio 1, access to fruit and vegetables, were started at one year, see Table 1.

Discussion

Government response to health determinants requires a multi-strategy approach. Stirling et al (2007) developed multi-criteria mapping to obtain stakeholder assessments of obesity policy options [37]. In WA, to improve consumption and access to fruit and vegetables, government and non-government stakeholders were involved in the development of a statewide strategy. Key stakeholder judgements were required to move the list of interventions from what we 'could' do, to what we 'should' do [38]. During this time there was considerable sharing of information and insights. The judging and discussing of specified criteria lead to a cross sector learning process that enhanced the group understanding of the detail and scope of the strategies and enabled them to be assessed and ranked accordingly. The process enabled issues of ownership and cost to be considered by those accountable for the outcomes.

A limitation of the process is that people work in the context of what they perceive is possible and may underestimate the amenability for change. For example, at the time of the intervention selection the group thought that mandating guidelines for foods provided in school canteens was not a politically favourable option. Since then, governments in Australia have started to mandate for schools to provide food and beverage choices consistent with the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating; NSW initiated the process [39]. The WA school canteen accreditation scheme (STARCAP) intervention has provided a comprehensive infrastructure to support mandated policy directives.

It has been suggested that interventions be designed and delivered in ways that strengthen and support each other, for example, using social marketing campaigns like the Go for 2&5® campaign to provide support, process and rationale for school canteen interventions [39]. An advantage of the process outlined here is that interventions that support each other can be identified and partnerships developed during the planning process.

Using this planning framework to develop management portfolios and assign responsibilities highlighted the need to also identify management performance measures including economic evaluation. Developing models to measure cost effectiveness for public health strategies that are implemented in a range of settings by practitioners from different backgrounds is a task yet to be undertaken. A review of the NSW state policy for child obesity prevention notes the importance of specific outcomes or set evaluation measures for actions addressing government policy [40].

It is important to note that there were some resources available for interventions at the time of selection. A reasonably well-funded government Health Promotion Directorate led the process. The Directorate had a 20 year history implementing social marketing campaigns and the Western Australian Health Promotion Foundation, Healthway, provided funds for community based health promotion interventions. Some actions identified to provide the infrastructure support for improving access to fruit and vegetables had not started at the time of the audit. The lack of action was not due to rethinking or abandoning the priority, it appeared to be due to the length of time required to instigate the more costly and complex strategies which required aligned action across sectors and engagement of external partners, such a research and development capacity and building information systems.

In 2003, the Government section responsible for leading the development of the portfolio was disbanded and the emphasis shifted from risk factor focus, for example nutrition, to a chronic disease prevention focus. Planning frameworks with designated custodians from a variety of sectors may enable work to continue during these types of organisational reforms.

Health promotion to improve nutrition will need to address wider food supply issues, particularly who controls and influences the food chain and thus individual and community food choices [41]. The global food supply is also an issue of local concern [42]. Influential and diverse stakeholders will need to be engaged in and committed to the process, particularly in the areas of food and nutrition policy development and providing the infrastructure support required.

Further work is required to develop performance outcomes and cost effectiveness measures for many of the strategies that have been proposed to address objectives.

Conclusion

Comprehensive multi-component strategies that are implemented strategically over sustained periods of time are required to increase fruit and vegetable consumption [43, 44]. Developing a State-based fruit and vegetable strategy using a defined framework for intervention highlighted the importance of stakeholder participation in the decision making process.

Abbreviations

EWWAFV: 

Eat Well WA-Fruit and Vegetable Strategy

WA: 

Western Australia

DHWA: 

Department of Health Western Australia

HAL: 

Horticulture Australia Limited.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The Eat Well WA-Fruit and Vegetable Strategy development was led and funded by the Western Australian Department of Health's former Nutrition and Physical Activity Branch. The authors acknowledge the Branch staff who worked on the strategy development and implementation, particularly Sonia White. We are grateful to the Steering Committee (Walter Arrow, Karen Beardsmore, Dennis Cerinich, Martin Dempsey, Steve Dilly, Robert McFerran, David Ellement, Joshephine Farley, Jon Gibson, Marilyn Yates, Kim James, Robert Halliday, Figaro Natoli, Dennis Phillips, Emma Stringfellow, Anna Richards, Norm Thompson, and Debbie Terelinck) and all those people who contributed to the process. Horticulture Australia Limited (HAL) supported Curtin University of Technology to prepare papers for publication.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Curtin University of Technology
(2)
North Central Metropolitan Primary Care Partnership

References

  1. Lobstein T: Food policies: a threat to health?. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2002, 61 (4): 579-585. 10.1079/PNS2002192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Drewnowski A, Darmon N: Food choices and diet costs: an economic analysis. Journal of Nutrition. 2005, 135 (4): 900-904.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rolls BJ, Drewnowski A, Ledikwe JH: Changing the Energy Density of the Diet as a Strategy for Weight Management. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2005, 105 (5, Supplement 1): 98-103. 10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.033.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Darmon N, Darmon M, Maillot M, Drewnowski A: A Nutrient Density Standard for Vegetables and Fruits: Nutrients per Calorie and Nutrients per Unit Cost. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2005, 105 (12): 1881-1887. 10.1016/j.jada.2005.09.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazzano LA: The high cost of not consuming fruits and vegetables. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2006, 106 (9): 1364-1368. 10.1016/j.jada.2006.06.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Tohill BC: Dietary intake of fruit and vegetables and management of body weight. 2005, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  7. Haslam DW, James WPT: Obesity. Lancet. 2005, 366 (9492): 1197-1209. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67483-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rolls B, Ello-Martin J, Tohill B: What can intervention studies tell us about the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and weight management?. Nutrition Reviews. 2004, 62 (1): 1-17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ledikwe J, Blanck H, Kettel Khan L, Serdula M, Seymour J, Tohill B, Rolls B: Dietary energy density is associated with energy intake and weight status in US adults. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2006, 83 (6): 1362-1368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. World Health Organization: World Health Assembly resolution WHA57.17 – Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. 2003, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  11. World Health Organization: Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Disease. WHO Technical Report Series 916. 2003, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  12. Strategic Inter-Governmental Nutrition Alliance: Position statement. Eat Well: the benefits of vegetables and fruit. 2000, Melbourne: National Public Health PartnershipGoogle Scholar
  13. National Public Health Partnership: Australia's National Action Plan to increase consumption of Fruit and Vegetables. 2000, Melbourne: National Public Health PartnershipGoogle Scholar
  14. Strategic International Nutrition Alliance: Eat Well Australia: An Agenda for Action for Public Health Nutrition. 2001, Canberra National Public Health PartnershipGoogle Scholar
  15. Department of Health in Western Australia: Eat Well Move Well WA-public health nutrition and physical activity plan for action 2002–2010. 2002, Perth: Department of Health in Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller M, Shiell A, Stafford H: An Intervention Portfolio to Promote Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. Part 1 – The Process and Portfolio. 2000, Melbourne: National Public Health PartnershipGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller M, Stafford H: An Intervention Portfolio to Promote Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. Part 2 – Review of Interventions. 2000, Melbourne: National Public Health PartnershipGoogle Scholar
  18. Gundgaard J, Nielsen J, Olsen J, Sorensen J: Increased intake of fruit and vegetables: estimation of impact in terms of life expectancy and healthcare costs. Public Health Nutrition. 2003, 6 (1): 25-30. 10.1079/PHN2002355.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Knai C, Pomerleau J, Lock K, McKee M: Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. Preventive Medicine. 2006, 42 (2): 85-95. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.11.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamphuis CBM, Giskes K, de Bruijn G-J, Wendel-Vos W, Brug J, van Lenthe FJ: Environmental determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among adults: a systematic review. British Journal of Nutrition. 2006, 96 (4): 620-635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McLaughlin EW: The dynamics of fresh fruit and vegetable pricing in the supermarket channel. Preventive Medicine. 2004, 39 (Suppl 2): S81-87. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee AJ, Darcy AM, Leonard D, Groos AD, Stubbs CO, Lowson SK, Dunn SM, Coyne T, Riley MD: Food availability, cost disparity and improvement in relation to accessibility and remoteness in Queensland. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2002, 26 (3): 266-272. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00685.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Giskes K, Turrell G, Patterson C, Newman B: Socioeconomic differences among Australian adults in consumption of fruit and vegetables and intakes of vitamins A, C and folate. Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics. 2002, 15 (5): 375-385. 10.1046/j.1365-277X.2002.00387.x. discussion 387–390View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Brug J, Debie S, van Assema P, Weijts W: Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among adults: Results of focus group interviews. Food Quality and Preference. 1995, 6 (2): 99-107. 10.1016/0950-3293(95)98554-V.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization: Fruit and Vegetables for Health Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Workshop, 1–3 September 2004, Kobe, Japan. 2004, WHO and FAOGoogle Scholar
  26. National Health and Medical Research Council: Dietary Guidelines for Older Australians. 1999, Canberra: Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  27. National Health and Medical Research Council: Dietary Guidelines for Children and Adolescents in Australia incorporating the Infant Feeding Guidelines for Health Workers. 2003, Canberra: Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  28. National Health and Medical Research Council: Dietary Guidelines for Australian Adults. 2003, Canberra: Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  29. National Public Health Partnership: A Planning Framework for Public Health Practice. Public Health Planning and Practice Improvement. 2000, Melbourne: National Public Health PartnershipGoogle Scholar
  30. Barraclough S, Gardner H: Analysing health policy. A problem-oriented approach. 2008, Marrickville: Elisevier AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller M, Pollard C, Paterson D: A public health nutrition campaign to promote fruit and vegetables in Australia. Multidisciplinary Approaches to Food Choice Proceedings of Food Choice Conference. Edited by: Worsley A. 1996, Adelaide University of Adelaide, 152-158.Google Scholar
  32. Miller M, Pollard C: Health working with Industry to promote fruit and vegetables: a case study of the Western Australian Fruit and Vegetable Campaign with reflection on effectiveness and inter-sectoral action. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2005, 29 (2): 176-182. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2005.tb00070.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Australian Bureau of Statistics: National Nutrition Survey Foods Eaten Australia 1995. Volume Catalogue Number 4804.0. Edited by: ABS. 1999, Canberra: Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  34. Pollard CM, Miller MR, Daly AM, Crouchley KE, O'Donoghue KJ, Lang AJ, Binns CW: Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption: success of the Western Australian Go for 2&5® campaign. Public Health Nutrition. 2008, 11 (3): 314-320. 10.1017/S1368980007000523.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller M, Pollard C, Coli T: Western Australian Health Department recommendations for fruit and vegetable consumption – how much is enough?. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 1997, 21 (6): 638-642. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.1997.tb01769.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris E, Wise M, Hawe P: Working Together: Intersectoral Action For Health. 1995, National Centre for Health Promotion & Commonwealth Department of Human Services: Australian Government Publishing ServiceGoogle Scholar
  37. Stirling A, Lobstein T, Millstone E: Methodology for obtaining stakeholder assessments of obesity policy options in the PorGrow project. Obesity Reviews. 2007, 8 (s2): 17-27. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00355.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Swinburn B, Gill T, Kumanyika S: Obesity prevention: a proposed framework for translating evidence into action. Obesity Reviews. 2005, 6 (1): 23-33. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00184.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bell AC, Swinburn BA: School canteens: using ripples to create a wave of healthy eating. Medical Journal of Australia. 2005, 183 (1): 5-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. King L, Turnour C, Wise M: Analysing NSW state policy for child obesity prevention: strategic policy versus practical action. Australia and New Zealand health policy. 2007, 4: 22-10.1186/1743-8462-4-22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Caraher M, Coveney J: Public health nutrition and food policy. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7 (5): 591-598. 10.1079/PHN2003575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wahlqvist ML, Lee MS: Regional food culture and development. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007, 16 (Suppl 1): 2-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pomerleau J, Lock K, Knai C, McKee M: Interventions designed to increase adult fruit and vegetable intake can be effective: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Nutrition. 2005, 135 (10): 2486-2495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pomerleau J, Lock K, Knai C, McKee M: Effectiveness of interventions and programmes promoting fruit and vegetable intake. 2005, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  45. Pollard C, Lewis J, Miller M: Start right-eat right award scheme: implementing food and nutrition policy in child care centers. Health Education & Behavior. 2001, 28 (3): 320-330. 10.1177/109019810102800306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Hribar S, Pollard C: 2002 Statewide Veg'n'Fruit Week: a Collaborative Success. Leadership, Excellence, Advocacy, Partnerships. 2003, Fremantle, Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  47. Foley RM, Pollard CM: Food Cent$ – implementing and evaluating a nutrition education project focusing on value for money. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 1998, 22 (4): 494-501. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.1998.tb01420.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pollard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement